مطالعه تطبیقی پایان بندیِ نمایشی و کارکردهای روایی آن در آثار ساعدی و نعلبندیان

This article is going by focusing on the structural aspects of Saedi and Nalbandian plays will do a comparative study of the ending strategies on them. Discuss theoretical approach derived from Neo- Aristotelian experts ideas (plot-based analysis) Will possible, provide qualitative analysis the ending method of plays and will offer guidelines for identify the existing weaknesses or exit out of this issue. Accordingly, based on the most common forms of ending of dramatic literature, The present article will focus Assessed its qualitative value and impact on the overall structure of the narrative in case Studies. Research Methodology, Is descriptive and analytical at first in Scope of case studies will investigates theoretical approaches and in continued the necessity of each of case Studies, by analyzing these samples based on the theoretical approach discussed, Will achieve to the research results. Finally, the research findings show that despite the different patterns and themes that has used, has experienced open-ended forms so that relativism similarities in them can be seen. With this difference, each of the two authors based on their distinct approach, apply different patterns and aspects in use of such ending. Based on the parameters examined, employing such a way of ending in Nalbandian plays has more appropriate Narrative and Dramatic structure of the play. In a word using open-ended plot in Nalbandian plays as an ending strategy has more appropriate with his dramatic structure that in way that Saedi use it as ending point in his classic and closed dramatic structure.