The establishment of a standard fatwa in art jurisprudence hinges on clarifying the government's relationship with artistic endeavors. This concept becomes particularly relevant when individuals or institutions face multiple conflicting fatwas and must select one as their operational benchmark. While personal production and consumption of art require no standardized fatwa—as individuals may follow whichever religious edict they find personally binding—governments require authoritative fatwas in three key policy areas: (1) allocating funds to promote beneficial artistic works, (2) restricting harmful or un-Islamic art dissemination, and (3) regulating art education in state institutions. This study, employing library research and analytical methods, demonstrates that different standard fatwas may apply to each domain without necessitating uniformity. By evaluating existing theories and proposing a new framework, the research suggests specific fatwa-selection approaches tailored to each type of government-art interaction.